On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:45:24PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:34:05PM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Wed, 23.04.14 23:03, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote: > > > > > > > This is needed to fix bug: > > > > > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76498 > > > > > > Hmm, do we really want to expose the version here? I fail to see the > > > general usefulness of this value. The release is a lot more useful and > > > we already expose that, so do we really want the version here? > > Speaking about the version it shows if this is an SMP kernel, and if the > > kernel is preemtible, IOW build with CONFIG_PREEMPT > > > > Now, how many preemtible kernels are running systemd? > > > > And by coincidence, here we are speaking about systemd-analyze :-) > > > > Not to mention the build time stamp that will tell you if two same > > kernels differ... used in the embedded world. > It might be useful to distinguish bootcharts generated with different > kernels when comparing compilation options or whatever. I'd be > inclined to keep it. Lennart please, can we close this bugzilla entry?
Thanks in advance! -- Djalal Harouni http://opendz.org _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
