On 22/09/14 17:58, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Hi Maurizio, > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi <mlomb...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original names used >> disk's sas address and lun, the new scheme uses sas address of the >> nearest expander (if available) and a phy id of the used connection. >> If no expander is used, the phy id of hba phy is used. >> Note that names that refer to RAID or other abstract devices are >> unchanged. > What's the problem with the current scheme, what's the benefit of the > new one? Will this break backwards compatibility, if so, why is this > justifiable? >
I wonder if it will solve this one... https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63806 ? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel