On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog > <u...@tezduyar.com> wrote: >> Can I send a patch to wrap them with a ./configure option? The option >> should even include to make udevadm-hwdb.c, libudev-hwdb.c and >> udev-builtin-hwdb.c configurable. > > Making systemd-hwdb optional (and hence also the .hwdb files) sounds > reasonable.
Great! I will prepare something. > > I don't think we should make the library optional though (it is tiny > and deals well with the db not being around, and having to make it > optional in its various consumers sounds like unnecessary work). > > Not sure about the builtin, it does not pull in any extra dependencies > (unlike e.g. blkid), and is pretty small, so not sure I see the > benefit of having it optional? It has been bothering me that udev is holding an fd to hwdb.bin but once we stop installing hwdb.bin, things should be fine. I am OK with your suggestion. Umut > > Cheers, > > Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
