Hi Tom, Any news on this ?
Best Regards, Alin -----Original Message----- From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 6:03 PM To: Rauta, Alin Cc: zbys...@in.waw.pl; t...@jklm.no; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kinsella, Ray Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Added support for Uplink Failure Detection using BindCarrier On Wed, 11.02.15 17:44, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > > +_public_ int sd_network_link_get_carriers(int ifindex, char ***ret) { > > + return network_get_link_strv("CARRIERS", ifindex, ret); } > > + > > > I think it would be better to have two calls here: > > > > int sd_network_link_get_carrier_bound_to(int ifindex, int **others); > > int sd_network_link_get_carrier_bound_by(int ifindex, int > > **others); > > In terms of functionality, " sd_network_link_get_carriers " is > actually " sd_network_link_get_carrier_bound_to" and is applicable to > "bound to" links just like "BindCarrier=" is available only for "bound > to" links. I wanted to save to systemd "run" files just minimum info. > > If I add "sd_network_link_get_carrier_bound_by", then each time > "link_save" is called for a link I should query "BindCarrier="s for > all interfaces to print each link that bounds the current interface. > Then, if I rename a link I should call "link_save" for all available > links because the "BindCarrier=" can be interpreted in another way due > to wildcards. Well, one option could be to keep a set of bound_by and bound_to links around for each link, and then just update that each time an interface comes, goes, or changes names. That way you always have direct access to the bound links, and don't have to resolve the globs each time you need them, but only when they actually change? The reason why I figured having two calls for this would be useful is simply to make it easy to write tools like networkctl, which wants to show this information in both directions for each interface... > > +/* get the links that are bound to this port. */ static int > > +get_downlinks(const char *name, > > + sd_rtnl_message *m, > > + LinkInfo **downlinks, > > + int *down_count) { > > Regarding "get_uplinks" and "get_downlinks" I can rename them to > "get_links_bound_to" and "get_links_bound_by". Would this be fine ? Sure! But before you rework any of this, let's see what Tom has to say, he's the networkd maintainer... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
