2015-03-31 16:20 GMT+02:00 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <[email protected]>: > > > On 03/31/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >> 2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >>>> >>>> What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since >>>> it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's >>>> intended purpose has been fulfilled already. >>> >>> Agreed that it doesn't make sense to have this distributed. E.g. Fedora >>> should retire the package. Upstream git repository should stay as a >>> historical >>> artifact of course. >> >> It's unfortunate though, that we don't have a nice replacement for >> GNOME, though. >> >> > > It's also unfortunate that there exist no native application to all the > other *DE floating around there is it not?
KDE has kcmsystemd > And from the looks of it the Red Hat desktop team maintainers in Gnome seem > to be expecting the Gnome users to be using Red Hat's own product cockpit to > take care of that. sorry, but that's not a real replacement for systemadm. Don't want to run a webservice just to inspect my local system. That's way overkill. > I'm pretty sure those that disagree with that in the Gnome community will > step up and write their own application which they can base on the KDE one > if they want to. Tbh, I don't see the problem. After all, systemd-ui is already split into a separate repo. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
