When I made the final ConsoleKit release, I added a NEWS entry, saying that this software was discontinued and pointing to the replacements.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ConsoleKit/commit/?id=af75e100dc4d4fac2e1633aa134e40e390d38918 We could do something similar for systemd-ui. That said, I think there is value in simply keeping the repo around. 2015-03-31 16:41 GMT+02:00 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johan...@gmail.com>: > > > On 03/31/2015 02:27 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> >>> >And from the looks of it the Red Hat desktop team maintainers in Gnome >>> > seem >>> >to be expecting the Gnome users to be using Red Hat's own product >>> > cockpit to >>> >take care of that. >> >> sorry, but that's not a real replacement for systemadm. Don't want to >> run a webservice just to inspect my local system. That's way overkill. > > > No argument here and I personally had been expected David King to take care > of writing and maintaining the native Gnome application. That however has > not happened yet. > >> >>> >I'm pretty sure those that disagree with that in the Gnome community >>> > will >>> >step up and write their own application which they can base on the KDE >>> > one >>> >if they want to. >> >> Tbh, I don't see the problem. After all, systemd-ui is already split >> into a separate repo. > > > The problem is nobody is maintaining this so someone either steps up from > the community, takes ownership of the application and cleans it up in the > process, and makes it a prime example of what could be done ui wise in > systemd or we drop it ( unless people are huge fan of things bit rotting ). > > JBG -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel