On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > * If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the > > same service name, and the user executes "systemctl enable" > > for it (or a related call), then this will now enable both > > (or execute the related operation on both), not just the > > unit. > > that is an horrible regression in context of someone has written a > systemd-unit for commercial software which only ships a sysv-init-script > like vmware as example
How so? the native unit always overrides the sysv init script. Hence the fact that the init script is enabled shouldn't really matter. We did this to be nice to Debian, so that they can support booting into sysvinit in parallel to systemd, so that the enable status is kept in sync between systemd and sysvinit. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
