Am 19.06.2015 um 16:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the same service name, and the user executes "systemctl enable" for it (or a related call), then this will now enable both (or execute the related operation on both), not just the unit.that is an horrible regression in context of someone has written a systemd-unit for commercial software which only ships a sysv-init-script like vmware as exampleHow so? the native unit always overrides the sysv init script. Hence the fact that the init script is enabled shouldn't really matter.
then all is fine, the text above is not clear about that and "now will enable both" implies start both
We did this to be nice to Debian, so that they can support booting into sysvinit in parallel to systemd, so that the enable status is kept in sync between systemd and sysvinit
the text above is just misleading
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
