Am 29.06.2015 um 17:01 schrieb jon:
On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 14:21 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:On 06/29/2015 02:08 PM, jon wrote:https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system I just installed debian 8.1, on the whole my reaction is mixed, one thing however really pisses me off more than any other "5.6.1. Stricter handling of failing mounts during boot under systemd" This is not "Stricter" it is a change in default behaviour. This change is a shit idea, who do I shout at to get the behaviour modified to back to sensible ?The systemd community only recommends what downstream consumers of it should do but does not dictate or othewise decided anything how those consumers eventually decide to implement systemd so if you dont like how systemd is implemented in Debian you should voice your concerns with the Debian community.Ok Who writes/maintains the code that parses "nofail" in /etc/fstab ? Who writes/maintains the typical system boot code (whatever has replaced rc.sysinit) ? I suspect the answer to both is the systemd maintainers, in which case is this not the correct place to bitch about it?
i don't get what is there to "bitch about" at allyou have a mountpoint in /etc/fstab and don't care if it don't get mounted at boot and instead data get written into the folder instead the correct filesystem?
normally that is not what somebody expects and if that is the desired behavior for you just say that to your operating system and add "nofail"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
