I can't really change anything about the way that the Node Manager does it's 
job. That all takes place outside of systemd. If I used the PIDFile option in 
the original systemd service (executing the WLST process), let's call this 
weblogic.service, and the PIDFile pointed to the PID file created by the final 
Java process, would that work or does the process that I'm ultimately starting 
have to descend directly from whatever it is that the unit file executes?

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:47:03 +0300
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Complicated SysVInit Migration
From: graw...@gmail.com
To: ljkimme...@hotmail.com
CC: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Lesley Kimmel <ljkimme...@hotmail.com> wrote:



All;

I'm struggling with figuring out how to migrate some SysVInit scripts to 
systemd. Specifically, this service launches WebLogic Managed Server (Java) 
instances Let me describe the process flow of my current service to you:

-The init service/script launches a Java process called WLST which executes a 
simple script
-This WLST process connects to an already running Java process called the Node 
Manager and issues a start command for the application server it wishes to start
-The Node Manager process executes a shell script as a subprocess. This shell 
script sets up a bunch of environment variables, etc.
-Ultimately the shell script launches a Java process which is a child of the 
shell script.
-When this Java process reports itself as running, the initial WLST Java 
process exits.
-In the end the actual service/process that we started, and want to manage, is 
actually the GRANDCHILD of a completely separate process from the initial Java 
process that systemd launched. How, would systemd track that process?

systemd would see it as an extra process belonging to NodeManager.service, 
nothing more.
If you want systemd to track it as an independent service, go back to step #3 
(where the Node Manager executes a shell script), and make that shell script 
merely run "systemctl start ..." instead of creating the new instance directly. 
(Make a template foo@.service unit for the WLMS instances.)
-- 
Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
                                          
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to