On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Pascal <patate...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi it's me again ;-), > > with options *network-bridge* or *network-veth*, you « need » to > configure network host card *ve-container@if2* and network container card > *host0@if5*.. > > with my request, the idea would be to not disconnect the loopback device > and so, without network configuration, the container could simply expose > network > services throught the host... > > instead of the option *port* to run with the option *private-network*, > this could be a new option (lo-network) that doesn't totally disconnect the > network of the two systems, but leaves only loopback device... >
Nice idea, but no. Systemd can't pick and choose which interfaces to "disconnect" and which to keep – Linux network namespaces are an all-or-nothing thing. You can only *move* interfaces between namespaces (e.g. host0 gets moved from the main NS to the container), but you cannot have the same interface in multiple namespaces at once. -- Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
