"Martin J. Dixon" wrote:
> "The retestings could be the tip of a doping iceberg, Pipe suggested. > Thousands of urine samples dating back several years are frozen at the > Olympic-approved Montreal lab. Pipe said that as the identities of > athletes who fail a new test become known, the CCES would consider > looking back at old samples to find out how long the athlete had been > using the drug and when its use became popular in the doping > underground." > > This next quote is actually funny. Somehow I don't think the coach's > motives were all that pure: Are there any coaches who might be ticked off with their current or past athlete(s)? > > > "“When you‘ve got a coach going to USADA with evidence, that speak to > two things,” Pipe said. “It shows USADA is gaining credibility as a > legitimate entity in addressing drug use. And perhaps there's a change > in the culture of sport and the attitudes toward cheating. Someone has > said ‘enough is enough.'”" > > http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20031017.wstero1017/BNStory/Sports/ > > Regards, > > Martin
