RMc
At 11:55 AM 10/29/2003 -0500, malmo wrote:
Perhaps if there are "numerous" messages of such a call without a hearing, you could find just ONE example that I missed. I've been unable to find it.
Thank you Richard, your veracity is always counted upon here.
malmo
-----Original Message----- From: Richard McCann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: malmo Cc: 'T&FMail List'; 'Martin J. Dixon' Subject: RE: t-and-f: Kelli White & narcolepsy
At 09:40 PM 10/28/2003 -0500, malmo wrote: >This embellishment thing is getting tiresome. I've yet to hear of a >band of vigilantes wanting penalties without a hearing.
Unfortunately, you must not be reading the messages posted on this listserve. There have been innumerable calls for athletes to be banned immediately upon certification of the B test, WITHOUT a hearing. We've had long discussions about the legitimacy of relying solely on scientific tests as proof without regards to other facts. For example, my post retrieved by Martin Dixon recently that revived this thread was in direct response to
just such a call.
