The examples you bring up Justin are unfair to the walks, and to the judges
that have to administer the rules.
Like referee's you can only call what you see, and all else is part of the
game. Even in track, the absolute does not guarantee compliance. Toe fouls
in all field events are a common topic of debate. The marking of landing
points in the sand, i.e., Robert Howard.
I mean, I still question the "Volzing" rule. I think it is over kill. The
same way I question the limit on reaction times. While based on some
empirical information, they are still arbitrary limits, and rules.
I do not profess to be a fan of walks, or to find them exciting, but to make
it look as if they are some kind of aberration in the sport, is false
representation. It is another event with another set rules, just like other
events in track and field.
The G.O.A.T.
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo mmrohl
- RE: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo Michael Casey
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo ed prytherch
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo Ed & Dana Parrot
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo mmrohl
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo JimRTimes
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo JimRTimes
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo GHTFNedit
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo Dgs1170
- RE: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo Justin Clouder
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo Dgs1170
- Re: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo sean other
- RE: t-and-f: Racewalking MumboJumbo Mike Casey