--- Jack Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, since the chip results are subject to revision by visual > examination that focuses on whose torso reaches the finish line first, > it is (IMO) a waste of money to use two chips.
What if someone's shoe falls off, a likelihood in any XC race? The chip quick scoring would be thrown off if that happened to be the shoe with the single chip, but I would hope the official re-examined results would pick up the ommission. One of our guys, who expects to be running at the DIII nationals (where someone stated the chip will be used) in a few weeks, already ran the last mile and a half of a race earlier this year without a shoe... Dan ===== http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc. http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests... ------------------------------------------------------------ @ o Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED] <|\/ <^- ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) _/ \ \/\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address) / / (503)370-9969 phone/fax __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com
