nvm found that too heh ... took a while :)

On 3/7/06, Cosmin Bucur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have not checked the new one indeed ... did now , quite an
> improovement . I'd stil like to be able to edit the year field , even
> pick the month from a list
>
> I will look for what it takes to achieve this ... i think from a
> usability perspective it's much better
>
> On 3/7/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, originally it was done because the tapestry datepicker did some
> > javascript variable assignments that aren't compatible with a more dynamic
> > page context..
> >
> > This has more to do with closures and how javascript treats things
> > differently depending on the context. Like the use of the word "this" has
> > many meanings. In one place it could mean the window, in another it could
> > reference a specific dom node, or the window's document dom. It's crazy! ;)
> >
> > I agree that <= beta-1 the DatePicker wasn't exactly great, but the picker
> > checked into cvs head for beta-2 is pretty damn good. Unless you guys have
> > found a problem with it? (besides having to include css files ...that's a
> > real pain)
> >
> >
> > On 3/7/06, Daniel Lydiard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tried using the tapestry one, but the main problem is that if you
> > refresh
> > > a div via tacos that contains a tapestry datepicker component the
> > javascript
> > > is never loaded for the component.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Cosmin Bucur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:54 PM
> > > Subject: [Tacos-devel] speaking of the datepicker
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a few questions as i'm looking through it .
> > >
> > > I have always thought that the usability on  the tacos datepicker is
> > > quite bad . I would like to fix this in a way or another . I am
> > > looking through the code and I see it's not even dojo or home made ,
> > > but imported from somewhere else ...
> > >
> > > in that case , my first question , before any other would be : why not
> > > use the tapestry one ?
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> > language
> > > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> > webcast
> > > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> > territory!
> > >
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tacos-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-devel
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> > language
> > > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> > webcast
> > > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> > territory!
> > >
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tacos-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-devel
> > >
> >
> >
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Tacos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-devel

Reply via email to