On jeudi 15 octobre 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > no, this is not the case. Multipolygon says: the inner part is NOT > part of the outer polygon.
I didn't say that ;-) I said : "an area representing something inside another area would still be part of a multipolygon relation" (I assumed people discussing this with me are familiar with the (advanced) multipolygon proposal and have assumed I was talking about an "inner" role in this case.) > let the mappers decide. So we do agree. My point was to stop or not to stop harrassing mappers that do not include inner polygons. and/or not updating the wiki acordingly, giving the choice, mentionning that solution. We could let decide, but give clues about what's for what. -- sly Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org qui suis-je : http://slyserv.dyndns.org _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
