Anthony-6 wrote:
>
> Where does the 58,000 number come from again?
>
If you scale up the result of the German analysis to the global numbers,
you'd get about 59000 individial trees that are intended as landmark trees
according to the wiki definition and would loose their meaning if the
definition is changed.
This is an assumption in lieu of better numbers.
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/tagging-single-trees-tp5501462p5506883.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
