M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Please: someone write a bot to add landmark=probably to every tree in
>> Germany,
>
>
> -1, please just for the Nürnberg area.
>
And what use could that possibly be in a restricted area like that?
Or did you forget the smileys?
From the topology analysis, I have marked every tree without further
information that has another tree within 50m with "denotation=cluster" so
you can tell it is not a single tree. That should be sufficient for
distinguishing mass trees and solve the ambiguity. And it's not a
"probably", but a simple fact.
For a first step, this was limited to all trees in Germany, I will extend it
in a few days when I have more time.
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/tagging-single-trees-tp5501462p5513391.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
