I'm talking about speeds that can be consistently measured, whether because of consistent rush hour conditions or other factors.

I wouldn't use 'average speed' for the tag, because it implies something else, but that's what the OP chose for this thread. 'traffic speed' or something like that would be better.

I'm not talking about "the fastest speed you can drive down this curving country road", which I agree is going to vary depending on the driver etc.

If I go to the nearest main road to my house in between the hours of 16:00 and 18:00 every weekday, I can measure the speed at which the traffic is moving. It will be consistent every day. It will be significantly lower than the 'maxspeed' (something like 1/5th maxspeed, like 8mph). All of the motor traffic will be travelling at this speed (it's so slow that 'slow' drivers will not be left behind!). For the rest of the weekday daytime the speed is more variable but is also significantly slower than the maxspeed. Only late at night/early morning is it physically possible for the traffic to get up to the maxspeed.

In UK cities, I expect many roads are like this. As you may imagine, using the raw maxspeed for routing (as all the routing systems and online routers I have ever used seem to do) is useless in this situation. Not only is the 'time to destination' totally incorrect, the route chosen is often wrong as well, because choosing a slightly different route would make journey times much quicker.

Routing programs can't use heuristics to work out these speeds, they are too dependent on local micro-conditions. But we can measure them.

Woll

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to