> Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:31:17 +0200 > From: Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Reviving the conditions debate > Message-ID: > <cakjckynqkfsxhltureutycfm9drjwmcxbx9sgocgy61qw2s...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I think I found a solution using a self-defined rule: > access:motor_vehicle!rule.time=10:00-18:00 > access:motor_vehicle!rule.width=5+ > access:motor_vehicle?rule=no > > Can this be simplified somehow (using the 1.5 proposal)? > > 2012/6/14 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: >> Hi! >> >> Maybe someone can help me defining the following access restriction >> using the 1.5 proposal: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Length_and_time_restriction_2.jpg
alternate version: access:motorized.time=Mo-Su 00:00-10:00,18:00-24:00 access!shortvehicle.length=5 access:motorized?shortvehicle.time=24/7 > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:53:33 +0200 > From: Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Reviving the conditions debate > Message-ID: > <cakjckymigho-wu20ya8wvco7u8pjrds7+ngickdotvvvufk...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > I tried to express this with the other proposal. I got this: > motor_vehicle:(Mo-Fr 16:00-18:00):forward=no > agricultural:(Mo-Fr 16:00-18:00):forward=yes > goods:(Mo-Fr 16:00-18:00):forward=yes > > motor_vehicle:(Mo-Fr 06:00-09:00):forward=no > agricultural:(Mo-Fr 06:00-09:00):forward=no > goods:(Mo-Fr 06:00-09:00):forward=no > > I assume here, that agricultural and goods are more specific than > motor_vehicle. Any chance of simplifying this? this notation has the same flaw as the current access scheme. it mixes transportation modes and user roles. "motor_vehicle" is a transportation mode. "agricultural" is a user role. not everywhere on this planet "agricultural" automatically means "motor_vehicle". that is what the 1.5 proposal tries to solve. flaimo _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
