2013/1/13 Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org>: > Perhaps instead of bridge_type, it should be bridge:structure, or some other > indication that it's referring to the general engineering and architecture > of the bridge rather than the vague "type" which might get confused with > "foot, cycleway, motorway" etc; and _ which isn't a good separator for what > is effectively a subkey.
sorry for replying quite late to this thread. I agree with Paul, tagging explicitly the structure in one subtag would be better, and IMHO one subtag is not sufficient for classifying bridges. I'd like to add a reference to another thread about the same topic one year ago: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-January/009162.html cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
