> I've just found the HOT tag > 'operational_status<http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/operational_status> >> ' >> This addresses a similar need, but it does not have a wiki page. >> >> For discussion on "operational_status": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Tags/operational_status
Found from here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Tags#Discussions > How about: >> >> operational_status=broken (usable for it intended purpose) >> operational_status=needs repair (usable, but impaired) >> operational_status=open (in good state of repair) >> operational_status:note=xxxx (human readable elaboration on the >> operational status) >> >> > > -1, IMHO this is flawed, as it requires from everybody to check for this > tag: if you make a map and ignore this tag you will put something not > working on the map as if it was working. Imagine amenity=hospital, > operational_status=broken or highway=bridge, operational_status=broken > > This approach has the same problem as the tags disused, abandoned, status, > ruins, construction, ... better use a prefix or suffix to avoid > misinterpretation. See the wiki for the mentioned tags to learn more. > > cheers, > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
