Hi,
fly is right here.
When it comes to snow cleaning, owners of the houses along a road are liable in
case of an accident if they didn't fulfill their duties. (At least in Germany -
some British court of law ruled this to be God's will if I am not mistaken).
However, I am not sure whether a sign is relevant here.
So, I propose:
- If in your country, a sign cannot change liabilities, do not tag it. The
access=* tag says it all.
- If the sign is legally relevant, use liability=no *and* the operator=* tag.
I could also imagine to use liability={user,operator} with a regional default.
-nik
fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> schrieb:
>Am 31.07.2013 15:46, schrieb Volker Schmidt:
>> I am sure this has been asked many times before:
>> How do I tag correctly a path/track/road that bears the label "access
>at
>> your own risk"
>
>This is no access sign !
>
>It is posted for insurance reason because this way does not cleaned
>(snow plowed eg.) and if you happen to have an accident cause of bad
>conditions it is your own fault/problem.
>
>We need some other tag to express this.
>
>cu
>fly
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet._______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
