On Monday 02 September 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > but admittedly the alternative approach (intermettent=yes) is used ~3 > times more often...
Of which >90% are from imports as well. The number of water features manually tagged as intermittent is sadly negligible. But yes, intermittent=yes/no makes much more sense for waterbodies than water=intermittent. Greetings, -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
