Am 27.09.2013 um 21:33 schrieb Michał Sałaban <mic...@salaban.info>:
> However it might create confusion with already existing bridge=aqueduct. IMHO bridge=aqueduct is nonsense, we also don't use bridge=highway or railway, and aqueducts don't have to be bridges, they are also underground, or on solid walls/foundations. FWIW I am using historic=aqueduct around here for historic aqueducts (I.e. mostly fragments and not a continuous working duct), and would expect sth like man_made as key for working ones, maybe also waterway would be fine. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
