On Friday, November 15, 2013, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > If you go back in this thread you'll see that "destination" is only one of > several possibilities for making the cycleway not compulsory any more to > the cyclist. > I think there is a misconception regarding "changing the world", this is > nothing you'll have to tag or bother with if you live in an area without > compulsory cycleways, so it really doesn't affect you at all. This is about > tagging a certain property to a road (this road has a compulsory cycleway > associated with it) in certain jurisdictions (e.g. NL, DE), where it does > matter. >
I do live someplace where this is relevant, and I'm still not seeing how the difference between the proposal and bicycle=destination isn't so subtle as to render the distinction irrelevant.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
