Hi, this is the first time I am answering to a mailing list. I checked "digest" and now I am not sure how to give individual answers, so I am going to answer to various questions of you within a single mail. Sorry. (I already unchecked "digest", so hopefully things will become easier next time.)
BGNO David Bannon wrote: > I'm particularly interested in unsealed and 4x4 roads/tracks, sure you have > seen the recent discussion. No, not yet. Where can I find that discussion? > We already have - surface=, smoothness=, tracktype=, 4wd_only=. > we'll need a better view of the possible values, thoughts ? I found a couple of values in taginfo (from a key of an abandoned proposal): http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=usability#values Interesting values are: yes, no, robust_wheels, 4wd. In my proposal I am using the unapproved value "off_road_vehicle" which is supposed to be different from "4wd". (A 4wd shall be an off road vehicle but also a tractor.) Philip Barnes wrote: > Whilst the idea is sound, I am not sure about the name. I am flexible with that. We can go with "usability" for example. Dan S wrote: > It reminds me quite a lot of opening_hours > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours > Would that be appropriate? No, it wouldn't. I modified the proposal in order to answer your question. Please see there. Dave Swarthout wrote: > Perhaps usability or passable or ??? I like "usability". There is an abandoned proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/usability Would it be possible to recycle the word "usability" for my proposal? Cheers BGNO _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
