2014-04-02 16:56 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>: > > There is also the case of sets; for example, four carvings which form > a single artwork, but which are mapped as separate entities. >
You could put the four carvings into a relation, and put the wikidata tag there (along with the name=* and tourism=artwork). Or you could create four wikidata items, and give them the attribute "part of" and connect with the first item. Then reference those four items in OSM. 2014-04-02 19:13 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>: > > One might also reasonably expect to find multiple instances of things > like material:wikidata=Q23757 (that's limestone). > I wasn't talking about xxx:wikidata=* tags. There can be lots of those. All sculptures by one artist should have the same artist:wikidata=* tag. All streets named after Nikola Tesla should have name:etymology:wikidata=Q9036. But there should be only one element with wikidata=Q384, or any other number. P.S. I'm not sure we should reference materials from Wikidata. That's going a bit too far. Tagging material=limestone should be enough. If we want to go that far with connecting OSM tags with Wikidata, there are better ways. I have thought about this, and with common tags like material=* we could make our own Wikibase installation, and connect tag combinations from OSM with Wikidata items. Janko
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
