Am 03.07.2014 17:42, schrieb Fernando Trebien: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> you can draw the runways as areas which I'd recommend because it solves all >> width rendering issues. > > I have actually mapped the runway area in many cases and thought of > eliminating the line representing the axis of the runway because of > this rendering problem (so, it would be mapping for the renderer), but > as I've seen that line mapped in other major airports in the world > (such as Munich's), I was a bit unsure if I should remove it. I'll > probably ask the OSM-Carto guys to change the default width. But in > this case, major airports (such as, again, Munich's) would need to > have the runway mapped also as an area (but many of them currently > don't).
Well, routing <-> rendering. If there is already/still a way(line) representing the area, we need to use area:highway (area:aeroway) otherwise we have several objects representing How about rendering width in general ? Something I am waiting for for some time now. To come back on topic: How is the issue solved with harbors ? aerodrome=* might be a tag for importance of the aerodrome or for a funtion like fright or international passagers but I will not work for both. Better introduce some more tags each with a clear purpose and definition. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
