> Am 03/lug/2014 um 21:55 schrieb Fernando Trebien <fernando.treb...@gmail.com>: > > But apart from that, I'm ok with mapping both features (contour and > axis), and indeed I've been doing so. But I'm amazed that major > airports in the world currently don't do that.
I wouldn't do it, it is redundant and someone counting all runways will probably count these twice > > It is possible that width rendering is complicated by map projections. > For instance, a width of 10 metres yields a different width in pixels > depending on latitude. Nonetheless I believe it is doable. Yes, this is one reason , the other is that mapnik doesn't support parametric parameters yet (e.g. take a color or a width from the db and use it as rendering style), or at least didn't until recently (I think this is a planned feature though) cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
