On 12.07.2014 08:25, malenki wrote: > When a proposal just sits in a wiki and doesn't get spread actively by > it's author on OSM channels (forums, mailing lists) it doesn't get much > attention. Even /when/ it is spread a lot of people (I included) > often prefer to let it be.
Unfortunately, I am no politician who can spend all of his time for campaigns. > The whole proposal is imho one of a mechanical edit. The proposal is about refining a tag definition in the wiki. I feared that the proposal could be voted down with respect to existing data not conforming to the new definition. That's why I needed to dig into that data issue. It's kind of a chicken-egg dilemma. You cannot get a proposal approved when existing data is dubious, and you cannot get a data cleanup accepted when the definition in the wiki is dubious. As a result, we stay with rotten definitions and rotten data for all time going. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
