> Am 08/ago/2014 um 12:47 schrieb k4r573n <k4r5...@googlemail.com>: > > In my opinion these paths shouldn't be used by default and we need a tag > to ensure routers and renders have a possibility to do so. > > access=destination > destination=climbing > > seams to be the best possibility
If there are legally binding signs, yes, if the legal significance of the signs is something like:"it would be kind if you won't use this path, because it is narrow and there is no room for many tourists to go along, as well as the wildlife will be disturbed by high frequentation, so even if you might legally go there, please consider not doing it.", then this tagging is "tagging for the routers" in the original meaning: abusing an established tag for something different in order to achieve the desired outcome. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
