FYI, according to taginfo (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/landuse) landuse is already used 226 432 times on a node. So not everybody thinks it is incompatible with nodes.
regards m On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Severin Menard <severin.men...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for providing these links. My comments inline below. > > Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 14:00:00 +0200 >> From: Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com> >> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" >> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> >> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag for livestocks pens >> Message-ID: >> <CAKjckOn Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:00 PM, < >> <cakjckypeq0dtrr-ydwb5hxve44pwmbznk4jy7rp7rwmekwk...@mail.gmail.com> >> tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org> wrote: >> >> Re: Tag for livestocks pens (Martin Vonwald) >> >> >> >> Am 01.09.2014 12:20, schrieb Severin Menard: >> >> > How should we map the livestock pens in farmyards? >> >> barrier = fence >> >> And (IMHO): it should be a permanet installation and no temporary >> thing... >> >> >> > >> > Thanks for your answer. Sure for barrier=fence, but it does not say what >> > is inside the fence. The houses have a fence for the people and those >> ones >> > are for the animals. When it deals with potential epizootics, it is not >> the >> > same thing. What about pen=yes or run=yes? (I do not find any >> occurrence in >> > taginfo, though). livestocks=* would serve to mention the kind of penned >> > animals. >> > >> >> This should help: >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=animal_keeping >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Danimal_keeping >> >> Best regards, >> Martin >> > > Actually we have used a landuse=livestocks so far and the issue is we > cannot always draw their extent as they can be small (but mapping them > remains important), what would lead to just put a node, but this is > incompatible with the landuse key. And I do not feel logical to draw a > polygon that does not represent the reality. I am wondering if for a node > we could not use the combination of: > animal_keeping=yes (or animal_keeping=pigs, goats, etc. as suggested > animal_keeping:type=* as also suggested > > and if a polygon is doable: > barrier=fence > landuse=animal_keeping > animal_keeping=pigs, goats, etc. as suggested > animal_keeping:type=* as also suggested > > What do you think? > > Sincerely, > > Severin > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20140907/01ebf5d3/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of Tagging Digest, Vol 60, Issue 18 >> *************************************** >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
