On 20 September 2014 11:11, Peter Barth <osm-tagg...@won2.de> wrote: > starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for > indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
Thanks for your efforts. Two points: - Should the level tags be subsequent numerical values, or the level names signposted in the building (for instance in the lifts)? In England, levels are often named basement/lower ground/upper ground floor. In Germany, I have seen buildings that distinguish floor 0 and floor -0. If a building starts with for instance Ground, Mezzanine, Floor 1, Floor 2, then it might be confusing to use levels 0, 1, 2, 3 for that, as then each level key would be off by one with the signed level. Why not use level for signposted levels and layer for a numerical order? - What is the reason for using indoor=corridor rather than highway=footway and stairs=* rather than highway=steps? Can a way have both tags? Sometimes routing through shopping malls is optimal even for long-distance foot routing, so it would be nice if regular routers could keep make use of such footways. -- Matthijs _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging