Thanks a lot, and yes You understood me correctly.
Regards Hubert From: Pee Wee [mailto:piewi...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014 12:48 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Vandalis on access page If I understand correctly you say it would be better if the wiki stated that the compulsory cycleway is drawn as a separte way. I think you are right. I could changed that in the wiki. Unfortunately the user Ulamm has changed the wiki (for the worse in my opinion) so I'll send him an email before I make any changes. Cheers PeeWee32 2014-10-08 12:34 GMT+02:00 Hubert <sg.fo...@gmx.de>: Thanks for the help and the links. That was my opinion, too. I asked, because the use is not clear by just reading the definition and not looking at the examples. highway=road + cycleway=track + bicycle=use_sidepath together, without an additional highway=cycleway OSMWay (for example) seem correct by definition. I can understand the confusion. Should the use be made more prominent in the description of the value? Yours Hubert _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org> .
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
