2014-11-17 13:53 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer <t.pfei...@computer.org>: > the value 'waste' is more consistent with existing amenity tagging than > refuse or garbage. >
the objects that have been brought up as examples have been of private nature, i.e. not an amenity for osm terms. I wouldn't include private waste bin protection structures under the same tag that we use to describe switching points of technical infrastructure like the power grid or telco, but I agree it could also be done. As it wasn't contained in the proposal the people voted upon, I'd prefer if including them now would be a distinct proposal. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging