> but some people at least are starting to use amenity=childcare. Please don't link to tags without proposals they are meaningless without actual data/definition. No reason to discuss them here.
kids_area=* is clearly defined as more advanced leisure=playground in the proposal. I will use this tag for malls and shops, fast_foods and restaurants, it perfectly makes sense and not because it's "indoor". But because equipment is different from what you will see at regular "leisure=playground" _without_ kids_area=*. This schema perfectly makes sense in some territories, you just need live there to understand it. 2014-12-17 19:38 GMT+04:00 Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com>: > > About supervision vs. childcare, we have lots of free supervised >> playgrounds here which do not offer child care, and and I have no >> experience with staffed child care facilties at malls etc. But for me >> amenity=kindergarten seems to be an good match to child_care you would >> have in a mall. >> >> > I know this tag has been at times contentious in the past, due to cultural > and linguistic issues, but some people at least are starting to use > amenity=childcare. According to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare, it's for a > place where amenity=kindergarten doesn't seem appropriate, for example > because there's no educational component. I think staffed child care at > malls (or at Ikea) would be a case where this would apply. > > Brad > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
