Andrew, you don't answered a question how to compare addr points to poi points, and chose is there one address or two or more.
Also there is no chance to map building with addresses with node (without polygonal geometry, in case you can't draw outline accurate enough). > This problem is already solved by bare address nodes. There's > absolutely no need to introduce an additional ugly complex scheme just > to avoid spatial lookups into the database. Please answer the questions before making such pathetic statements. Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:54:43 +0100 от Andrew Shadura <and...@shadura.me>: >On 19 January 2015 at 10:49, Dmitry Kiselev < dkise...@osm.me > wrote: >> yep it's all about "buildings who have multiple addresses valid for all >> suites." > >This problem is already solved by bare address nodes. There's >absolutely no need to introduce an additional ugly complex scheme just >to avoid spatial lookups into the database. This is something which is >easily done in the software, there's no need to put burden of >maintaining this stuff on humans. > >-- >Cheers, > Andrew
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
