On 21 January 2015 at 13:17, Friedrich Volkmann <b...@volki.at> wrote: >> And >> if that's the case, what's wrong with creating a node on the building for >> each additional valid address? People looking for an amenity could look up >> closest POIs after finding a secondary address. It's not a clean situation, > > It's a "best guess" approach, delivering lots of false positives, because > the scope of address nodes is undefined. The address may be valid for the > whole building, or only part of the building, or even for multiple buildings > (take my postal address as an example).
But that's not precisely true. The scope of an address node inside a building outline is this building. If you want to specify an address for a part of a building only, just split that building. -- Cheers, Andrew _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
