2015-01-20 14:56 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>:
> > Am 20.01.2015 um 08:44 schrieb Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > > 2015-01-20 3:36 GMT+01:00 715371 <osmu715...@gmx.de>: > >> motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no >> >> > Seems absolutely fine to me. One alternative (for better compatibility) > would be motorroad=yes + motorroad:lanes=yes|yes|yes|no > > this sounds strange to me, a motor road according to German law (and word) > is referring to a road, not to a lane, so there shouldn't be roads with > lanes of which some are motor roads and others aren't, it is more probable > that the whole motor road gets interrupted by the bridge (to allow crossing > by all vehicles) and restarts after it. > My response was solely to the tagging itself. If the original observation is wrong, that's a completely different story ;-)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
