Hi, On 01/28/2015 01:08 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > *removed:* > > * (features that do not exist anymore or never existed but are > commonly seen on other sources) > > I propose to remove the part "or never existed but are commonly seen on > other sources", because this has nothing to do with "removed".
Frankly, a feature that does not exist anymore has no place in OSM in my opinion. If there used to be a castle and now there's a ruin, then we tag that as a ruin (with potential add-on info about its former castle status). If there used to be a building but all that is left is a clearing in the forest, then the clearing will be in OSM, and not a building with a lifecycle tag of "removed". Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
