Loops and spoons are still quite common, even when each variation gets its own route relation to describe which ways are used from beginning to end. What is better in v2 is that the way to describe each of the variations, is completely unambiguous.
To me they are easier to fix when they get broken. Or at least it's easier to notice that they are broken and where, as long as the ways are ordered. Jo 2015-02-16 18:58 GMT+01:00 Éric Gillet <gill3t.3ric+...@gmail.com>: > 2015-02-16 13:03 GMT+01:00 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: > >> There are still cases where forward/backward are useful with P2-routes. >> E.g. a route with a loop and some members used twice but different >> directions. >> > > Shouldn't one just duplicate the stop_positions in the relation, and add > ways twice in order, without roles ? > > Also, as Jo said, the public transport v2 scheme is cleaner as each > variant of the route have its own relation, making loops in routes a rare > case. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
