> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Am 17.02.2015 um 21:52 schrieb Richard Z. <ricoz....@gmail.com>: >> >> Deciding between the two would be always arbitrary > > > I'd not expect practical problems (inside a playground vs not), and > distinguishing the two will help when rendering and you wanted different > rules according to context >
+1 If the zip line endpoints a get a certain rendering at a certain zoom level, having the 10m line in a playground generate aerial way station endpoints in the middle of a playground doesn't sound very beneficial. I know that can be mitigated by min length or something, but ultimately a playground amenity and an a "adventuring" amenity for adults seems like a very different thing - maybe there is a kid and adult version of a zip line - and contained inside a playground (or park?) sounds like a good dividing line. It may just be the same cable - but the expectation and purpose is a bit different - things a 10 year old operates by themselves next to a swing set and something I wear a Harness and crash helmet for seem different. Keeping playground equipment separate from adventure "rides" or things as long as some cable cars or ski lifts seems appropriate. Javbw > cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
