Did sleep one night and now think we should include bays and lanes within the lanes:-Tagging
lanes=3 lanes:forward=2 lanes:backward=1 access:lanes:forward=yes|yes|emergency access:lanes:backward=yes|emergency All together I am not happy with the description of lanes=* and lanes:*=* anymore. Where is it useful as we already do not count bicycle lanes but do count exclusive bus or taxi lanes and even ones with access forbidden but wide enough for motorized vehicles. Would prefer to change lanes=* and lanes:*=* to be the numbers with general access allowed and adding all additional lanes with access:lanes: lanes=2 lanes:forward=1 lanes:backward=1 access:lanes:forward=yes|no|no access:lanes:backward=yes|no bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|designated|no bicycle:lanes:backward=yes|yes bus:lanes:forward=yes|no|designated bus:lanes:backward=yes|designated taxi:lanes:backward=yes|yes width:lanes:forward=3|1.5|2.5 width:lanes:backward=3|3 Would be a road with forward a normal lane, a bicycle lane and either bus bay or bus lane (depending on length) and backward a normal lane and a bus lane with bicycle and taxi allowed. Am 26.02.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Martin Vonwald: > 2015-02-25 16:52 GMT+01:00 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: > >> Well, emergency=bay might interfere with access tagging and we should >> probably use left/right as you will find them not only on dual carriage >> roads. >> >> emergency_bay=both/left/right ? >> > > That seems reasonable to me. > >> How do we tag emergency lanes ? >> > > I asked that some time ago, but afaik there's no solution (yet). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
