On 11/03/2015, johnw <jo...@mac.com> wrote: > Actual physical bridges - which may offer the only way across a ravine, or a > landmark to where you are on a river sounds like a similar justification - > so rendering abandoned, yet physically existing bridges seems like exactly > the kind of thing that would be included - especially since their inclusion > would offer no clutter or distraction at levels where other items would > cause quite a lot of visual clutter for similar orinentation benefit.
[...] Again : the osm-carto dev agree that all bridges should be rendered. It's two longstanding bugs, it takes time to fix. Not rendering abandoned railways (wether or not on top of a bridge which should itself be rendered) is a separate issue (this time not a bug but a conscious decision). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
