On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 11:06 +1100, Warin wrote: > No, not a decision for the render but information for the end user .. the > most important pero=son is the end user! > 'Customers' first! :-) I don't think there are too many "end users" who look up the raw data!
> The map user wants to search for the closest camp sites and then select for > the features they want. Agreed, whole heartedly ! > None= nothing other than an area to pitch a tent or park a vehicle. > Basic = None + a toilet > Standard = Basic + water > Comfort = Standard + shower > First Class = Comfort + cloths washing (+ power?) > Luxury =Comfort + camp kitchen/swimming pool/restaurant And a camp ground that has a pool but no cloths washing facility ? Is the water drinkable ? BBQ, fire places, defined 'pitches', metered/unmetered power, disabled toilets, shade, grass, cooking facilities, rec room, launching ramp, fish cleaning facilities, internet access, pets allowed/not, child/dog minding capability, credit card facilities ..... Need a category system, for sure, but need a lot of extra data not implied by the category. > --------------------------- > There is a similar proposal for hotels > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Awards_and_ratings I think the range, the size of the matrix, is smaller for hotels. > Get off your unrealistic expectations of instantaneous correct data Yeah, agree, we are mapping a real world ! Its analogue and it changes. David _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
