Hello Ole, I see your point, but it would have been nice if you would have let me know that you removed the entry.
Regards, Jan On Sun, Mar 29, 2015, 13:11 Ole Nielsen <on-...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > I'm the one who reverted your edit to > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:power > > The power features template isn't the appropriate place for this tag. > The template includes important power infrastructure features such as > power=line and some of the most essential attribute tags to these > features such as voltage=*. Your proposed tag clearly doesn't belong > there since it's not intended to be used with power features. It seems > like it is rather to be used together with tourism=camp_site and similar > features. Therefore it should be documented on > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Camp_site . I see that there are > already various other attributes defined on that page and it would be > natural to include your tag there as well. > > Ole / opani > > On 28/03/2015 22:35, Jan van Bekkum wrote: > > I did that, but somebody reversed it without telling me. I now put it in > > the tourism section. > > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:14 PM Michał Brzozowski <www.ha...@gmail.com > > <mailto:www.ha...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > You have to edit the Map Features template. > > > > Michał > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Jan van Bekkum > > <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbek...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > I can't find how I get this in Map_Features. Can anybody help? > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM Jan van Bekkum > > <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbek...@gmail.com>> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals > and 2 > > >> rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved: > > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Power_supply:schedule > > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule> > > >> > > >> Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards, > > >> > > >> Jan van Bekkum > > >> www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl <http://www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum > > <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbek...@gmail.com>> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7 > > approval votes, > > >>> and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the > > voting period > > >>> for another week. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> Jan > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > > <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote: > > >>>> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated > > >>>> >> previously > > >>>> >> allowed to vote? > > >>>> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand, > > sitting back > > >>>> > and > > >>>> > only being involved to vote 'no' is - > > >>>> > > > >>>> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners > > rules. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a > > proposal, > > >>>> > where > > >>>> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake > > of killing > > >>>> > it ? > > >>>> > > >>>> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the > > >>>> comments/draft time to do that. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > >>>> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any > > community, > > >>>> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are ! > > Perhaps a > > >>>> > short > > >>>> > para on good manners on the voting page ? > > >>>> > > >>>> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments > > section. With > > >>>> an expansion on the voting section? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > >>>> > David > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _________________________________________________ > > >>>> Tagging mailing list > > >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > > Tagging mailing list > > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging