On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > 2015-04-20 2:14 GMT+02:00 David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net>: > >> Would camp_site:pitch=42 be more appropriate ? >> > > I think the number should go into ref, e.g. > ref=42 > camping:pitch=yes or camp_site:pitch=yes (etc., e.g. permanent, tent, > ...) not actually proposed or detailed yet > I think ref has a different meaning. Imagine you imported a park service database of pitches, each might have a ref different from the pitch number known to the public: tourism=camp_site operator=Aurthur Dent addr:housenumber=100 addr:street=The Road name=The Answer Campground sanitary_dump_station=yes addr:unit=1 ref=AZQ-1A sanitary_dump_station=no addr:unit=42 ref=AZQ-42A sanitary_dump_station=yes highway=service addr:interpolation=1 adrr:unit=43-101 ref=AD-ROAD-123 Now imagine say "The Answer Campground site 42" and getting routed all the way to the pitch.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
