On 29 May 2015 at 13:06, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > W dniu 29.05.2015 13:47, pmailkeey . napisał(a): > >> On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: >> >> W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a): >>> >>> I know there is a way to tag what the building as to what it was >>>> initially used for - but i don't think that is the proper way >>>> (afaik). >>>> >>> >>> So what do you think about building=church + amenity=museum then? >>> >>> I think we need some clear, general rules. Current system is >>> horrible in this matter, but I'd like it to be at least a bit >>> coherent. >>> >> >> building=museum. >> >> A museum is no more an amenity than a house is. >> > > So why do we use building=church + amenity=place_of_worship? > > If we tag the building with its function (and not the shape), we already > know that this is a place of worship. > > A 'church' should be building=place_of_worship - the building where the church congregates - if you want to be accurate about it. Quite a few churches meet in other buildings built for other purposes.
-- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
